Talk:Dupleix-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 08:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

This article is in good shape. A few comments: 'Body That's all I could find. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Lead
 * suggest "The Dupleix-class consisted of three armoured cruisers"
 * suggest "the ships of the class were smaller and less powerfully armed" and move the link to sister ship to the the second para
 * "Desaix and Kléber exchanged assignments in 1907 later "
 * Ottoman Empire is duplinked
 * "but in July she struck a naval mine laid by a German submarine and sank" (but the body says June?)
 * comma after "to the Navy Minister"
 * "the traditionalists who wanted cruisers"
 * suggest "modernists who believed in sought armored cruisers"
 * link Armand Besnard
 * "and that it the ships needed more endurance"
 * the displacement in the body and infobox don't match
 * I don't suppose you can link short tons?
 * conning tower armor in the infobox "9,100–120 mm"
 * intro 3rd DL before using the abbreviation
 * Ottoman Syria is duplinked
 * Thanks for catching these. I don't really see a need for a link to short tons; links in the literature are only between metric and long tons.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries, fair enough. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by an acceptably licensed image with an appropriate caption. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)