Talk:Dusky crag martin/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Article is well wriiten and complies with WP:MoS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All references appear to be in order.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article covers major aspects and is focused on its subject.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article complies to WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article appears stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images comply with requirements.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Summary: Everything is in order and I am satisfied that the article complies to all the requirements for a Good Article. As such, I am pleased to pass this article for GA status.