Talk:Dying Light

Untitled
why is the page so small? Assassin | 1776 23:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

where the hell is the Reception section?

Seems written like an advertisement
I added an advert template. The last half of the article seems like an advertisement. It's like something you would read on the back of the game's box.

"At night, the hunter becomes the hunted, as the infected become aggressive and more dangerous. Most frightening are the predators which appear only after sundown. Players must use everything in their power to survive until the morning’s first light."

The entire article could use a rewrite too in my opinion. Billybobjoe997 (talk) 18:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Reassessment request
Came here via the reassessment request in the project box. Bumping this up to B-class; here are a few things I noticed while looking through the article:
 * The lead is a bit short for the article; it's not really summarizing the whole thing. The (IP) callout is odd as well.
 * The last sentence of gameplay is written as if the game is not yet out, but it is.
 * The article could use a copyedit before GAN; example: "The players who is playing as humans", "There's a game mode" (don't use contractions), "But when he arrives, he must decide" (don't start a sentence with "but")
 * You're flipping at times between "15 February 2015" and "February 15, 2015" - pick one
 * It's kind of odd to talk for several sentences about a PewDiePie quote without ever saying what the quote is.
 * You may not be able to, but it would be nice if the text of the music section wasn't shorter than the infobox. Also, you say the name is "Dying Light (Original Score)", but that's clearly not what's written on the soundtrack image? (VGMdb, not a citeable source, calls it "Dying Light Soundtrack", which is what's on the cover.
 * Current consensus is to round GameRankings scores to the nearest percent, since hundredths is a meaningless over-detail (as it's an average of whole-percent scores)
 * Chopping up reception into one-paragraph-per-reviewer is a poor idea; better to split it up by concept (graphics, gameplay, combat, story, etc.) or to clump similar reviews together. You also shouldn't be reporting the individual scores that they give, that's what the table is for.
 * -- Pres N  21:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the reassessment. I will take a look at these issues soon. AdrianGamer (talk) 04:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Positive reviews?
Why does this article say that the game received positive reviews when Metacritic says it received mixed reviews? What's the source for this? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Changed back to mixed reviews. OceanHok (talk) 06:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)