Talk:Dylan and Cole Sprouse/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Reasonably wll written
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I fixed some dead links
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient coverage given the subjects' age
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this complies sufficiently to keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this complies sufficiently to keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)