Talk:Dylan and Cole Sprouse/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct, this article complies with Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * See notes below. The sources here are fine (But I have doubts to "Gossip Center.com") and this contains no original research.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * See notes below. This article is quite focused on the subject.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * It all seemed preety fair to me.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * I can see that the page is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All the images are tagged and there are no non-free images, see notes below for point b.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * – Plarem (User talk contribs) Flag of Europe.svg 14:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments

 * For point Number six, the note is that the current picture of them could be a bit newer, but that is only a proposition.
 * The end of Dylan and Cole Sprouse may leave the reader wanting more, as to what are they doing now, because this ends at 2010.
 * I will leave a citation needed tag where references are needed.

FAIL – I have assessed the article and left recommendations, but noone can find what are they doint now and find the citations that are needed in 5 days. I am sorry to say that I have failed this article, Tough luck lads... – Plarem (User talk contribs) 15:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)