Talk:Dynamic unobserved effects model

Scope
I believe the author(s) of this article read section 15.8.4 of Wooldridge (2002) too literally. The section says: "Here we cover one class of models that illustrates the important points for general dynamic models and is of considerable interest in its own right." In contrast, this article seems to suggest that the model described here (a dynamic panel with binary outcomes) is the only model that can be called a "dynamic unobserved effects model". I suggest that this article be broadened to include all dynamic panel models, including linear models (with coverage of Arellano–Bond). If that happens, dynamic panel model should be redirected here and the links at panel analysis should be updated. I know this talk page will likely go unread but I'm not sure where else to document my intentions. Wikiacc (¶) 03:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Related to this, the dynamic unobserved effects model for censored data at Tobit model should be moved here, since it makes more sense in context with other dynamic panel models, rather than with other tobit models. Wikiacc (¶) 17:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)