Talk:E-Cycling

This whole article needs to be rewritten
It reads more like a magazine article than an encyclopedia entry.

References dead
Reference no. 2 is dead. "page not found". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.6.127 (talk) 21:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

"Reuse" concept is lacking
I have noticed that there is a general lack of the term “reuse”, one the three R’s of waste hierarchy, in this and other recycling articles. Being “green” does not mean simplistically recycling straight into raw materials. In Germany they disassemble junked cars and reuse certain parts to avoid environmentally expensive manufacturing. If you look at electronics and mainly computer recyclers, it’s tossed right into the scrapper though most non-hard drive parts are reusable and may not be manufactured anymore yet needed. It should be pointed out in the articles that many recyclers currently refuse to practice reuse thought it may be more profitable. I was trying, but could not figure how to successfully interject these concepts into these recycling articles because these articles seem to be constructed to have a one tracked focus solely on resource recovery recycling.Septagram (talk) 21:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)