Talk:E-International Relations

Journal or magazine?
According to this publication's own submission guidelines, editorials will be reviewed by a single reviewer. Nothing is said about other types of articles. This does not sound like the classical peer review process of academic journals, but more like the editorial procedures followed by magazines or newspapers. This publication should therefore be called a "magazine" and the words "peer-reviewed" should be removed from the lead. --Crusio (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * That it be non standard is little surprising, it should not be censored nevertheless. Electronic journals are forming an observable trend, especially in reaction to the many acknowledged biases of standard peer-review. I submit the journal be labelled "non standard peer review", out of respect for Crusio's seasoned though possibly conservative point of view GrandPhilliesFan (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Nobody is talking about "censoring" here. Could you please tone down your rhetoric to what is customary on WP? There is no evidence that there is "non-standard peer review" (whatever that may mean). I don't understand the resistance to calling this a "magazine", that's a perfectly respectable thing, albeit a different one from an academic journal. --Crusio (talk) 12:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on E-International Relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100822000009/http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2010/0617_human_rights_korea_cohen.aspx to http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2010/0617_human_rights_korea_cohen.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)