Talk:E. Wedel

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.foodprocessing-technology.com/projects/cadbury/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on E. Wedel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718022701/http://www.rp.pl/artykul/74544.html to http://www.rp.pl/artykul/74544.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100125170416/http://discoverpl.polacy.co.uk/art%2Ccadbury_and_wedel_8211_a_sweet_investment%2C3574.html to http://discoverpl.polacy.co.uk/art%2Ccadbury_and_wedel_8211_a_sweet_investment%2C3574.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

"Famous"
I don't think the use of this word in the first sentence of the article makes for an encyclopedic tone. I'm guessing the point being made is that they are one of the most well-known and reputable brands in Poland. In that case, that's the way it should be worded. Otherwise, you might as well stick the word "famous" in the beginning of every Wikipedia article about a successful brand, company, politician, author, artist etc. It sounds like marketing, and not very subtle, either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1812:1634:9200:575:7F19:D490:FCAD (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2018 (UTC)