Talk:E2A Architects

Rewrite
This article is so full of jargon, buzzwords and opinion that it is almost unintelligible. Can someone who understands architecture please do a rewrite? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm an architecture graduate and I tend to agree with you. It may be partly a translation problem and partly a copy-paste issue by someone who doesn't understand the jargon either :) I've simply removed "In the design process, E2A focuses on the interdisciplinary process that synthesizes analytic reaction to context as well as a hypothetical and programmatic approaches to interpret the contemporary condition", because it is basically what all good architecture practices should be doing i.e. analyse the situation to come up with a theoretical and practical solution. Sionk (talk) 14:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)