Talk:E5 Project

Draft navbox
I'm unsure of how appropriate a navbox would be for this article, but supposing it is I would propose the below.

5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 23:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Wording
Can anyone else see why is problematic? Was the company originally planned to enter service in 2021, or one of its ships? I don't think this is important to mention at all (it would be more noteworthy if a major project like this didn't miss initially projected opening dates), but if it's important to keep it, it should be reworded to make the meaning clear. --84.64.247.8 (talk) 11:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * That refers to the ships themselves, which I see as pretty clear in the context (in the middle of the section dealing with the e5 Tanker, and specifying ). It's notable because it specifies the timeline the ship's development was intended to follow, which is what that particular sentence describes. The ship should have been done by 2021, but has been delayed. If you really think it is unclear, it could be reordered to read:
 * "Asahi Tanker Co. are currently constructing two ships of the e5 Tanker design, the first of which will be completed by March 2022 and the second in March 2023, revised from an original completion target of 2021."


 * 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 11:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! That's much better. --84.64.247.8 (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)