Talk:ECW Originals

list of tna guys
whoever is editing the list of the guys who were part of it for the tna ppv stop it. the list i keep putting on there is updated but someone keeps deleting all the guys who showed for the ppv. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aallen1995 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Like I said in my edits. Guys like 2 Cold Scorpio, Axl Rotten and Balls Mahoney were never billed as members of EV 2.0. Appearing at the PPV, doesn't automatically make them members of the stable.TheFBH (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

yes they do.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aallen1995 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

EV 2.0 was all the ECW originals who showed up in TNA for the pay per view and other appearances alike. they were all part of the stable by appearing.. Just because they didn't show up on the impact after Hardcore Justice doesn't mean they werent apart of the stable..-Aallen1995 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aallen1995 (talk • contribs)
 * Well, you're just wrong. They never claimed to be members of EV 2.0, Dreamer never said they were, nor did Tenay, Taz or anyone on TV. They were just ECW originals taking part in the reunion. Source your claim that 2 Cold Scorpio, Axl Rotten and Balls Mahoney were members of EV 2.0 and prove me wrong. And by the way, sign your responds.TheFBH (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

EV 2.0 was the name for ECW originals but they couldn't use it due to wwe. Dreamer said so. 2 Cold scorpio and all the rest were all part of it for that one weekend and they are all technically "ECW Originals", so anyone who showed up should be considered a member, also don't delete Jerry Lynn or The FBI because they all came down and joined the stable the impact before the PPV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aallen1995 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

picture
isnt the picture i added before better than nothing?--Jeffhardywhyx 21:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)--
 * It was incredibly dark and everyone was facing the other way. Didn't really add accomplish anything.«»bd(talk stalk) 00:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Don't Merge
The article should not be merged, they are 2 separate stables who happen to be in the same brand.


 * My vote is Keep separate. I don't think they "just happen" to be in the same brand, but they are of equal notability/importance, so it doesn't make sense to make one subordinate to the other's article.  If they were merged, they should be merged into an article about this storyline, but that's not something you usually see on WP, except for really really notable angles. - Geoffg 18:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

The discussion is here, per the link in the template.«»bd(talk stalk) 19:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Merge from New Breed (ECW)
Please merge relevant content from [ New Breed (ECW)] per Articles for deletion/New Breed (ECW), and discuss the final name of the merged article. Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 09:31Z 
 * The merger will be undone, I don't know how you got a merge consensus when only 1 person of the 10 people in the AFD wanted a merge. TJ Spyke 03:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Three people recommended merge and nobody said anything against merge. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 02:42Z 
 * More people wanted a keep. I would have objected to the merge then, but it was clear that it was not what most of the people wanted. TJ Spyke 03:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You shouldn't have merged them anyway. AfDs don't govern merges. --  The  Hyb  rid  03:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Chris Benoit is not part of the stable
take him out Lex94 20:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

The stable has not disbanded
I will take the disbanded date out, until the disband is formally notified by wwe or wwe.com Lex94 14:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Stevie was a member
Stevie Richards was a member for a short time in house shows so I do not think he should be taken off every time I add him as a member. From Thebluesharpdude 08:10 August 26, 2007.

Keep the other originals
Do not delete the other ECW originals on Raw, Smackdown, and ECW on Sci Fi because it is important to keep them on the article so people recognize them as originals.

Don't erase the post renunions
Please do not erase my recent edits about Tommy Dreamer and Stevie Richards because this article is better it is updated. From Thebluesharpdude 01:17 September 3, 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebluesharpdude (talk • contribs) 20:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Debut vs Years Active.
It says they debuted in 2006 yet were active in 2005. How is that chronologically possible? AntonFMD (talk) 21:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)