Talk:EDACS

NPOV
A lot of this text seems NPOV. Examples:


 * "the GETC's unparalleled flexibility remains a testiment to American industrial engineering, and hundreds of thousands of users in the field continue to rely on this innovation for their daily operations, safety and security."


 * "The competition dealt with fault tolerance by means of the "brute force and ignorance" approach, deploying double the hardware for their controllers, and interconnecting them with massive and problematic relay banks."

Perhaps, but truth is truth.

I agree about NPOV issues. I removed some of the stuff that didn't contribute any actual information, but haven't dealt with things that are true but worded in a somewhat biased way. I inserted a lot of tags; some aren't NPOV issues as much as facts that just need citing. The article still needs some work to read more like an encyclopedia than an advertisement for EDACS. Fogster 22:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EDACS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080913082950/http://hamradio.arc.nasa.gov/EDACS_Whitepaper.pdf to http://hamradio.arc.nasa.gov/EDACS_Whitepaper.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

I modified another link as it now redirects to a site serving malware. See my edit here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EDACS&oldid=960397583 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.56.72.22 (talk) 18:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)