Talk:EGSY8p7

My contradict-inline template
List of the most distant astronomical objects says GRB 090423 is more distant than EGS-zs8-1. The GRB 090423 article sounds like its approximate redshift, and thus distance, was known soon after its 2009 discovery, before the discovery of EGS-zs8-1 in 2015. If so, then how could EGS-zs8-1 have been considered the most distant object, when GRB 090423 was known to be further? That is also consistent with the EGS-zs8-1 article which says it was briefly considered "the most distant and the oldest galaxy observed" ("most distant galaxy", not "most distant object"). Art LaPella (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What you say is consistent with the records box underneath the text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:16, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops sorry, I must have confused 2 different EGS names. Self-reverting.