Talk:EHRC

UK vs Ethiopian Human Rights Commission
There have been two edits changing this disambiguation page into a choice to favour the England/Wales human rights commission as "the" primary topic, for part of a country of 67 million, while preventing Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, for a country of 120 million, being the primary topic. The two edits are: What is the reason claimed for the small-country EHRC to be the "primary topic" while the big-country EHRC is not the primary topic? How is this not demographic bias? Boud (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * with no explanation except nope and
 * with the edit summary It's not the Ethiopian one either. This is a two dabs situation.

And a better question: are there any serious arguments against this page being a disambiguation page? Boud (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * If I AGF on eval, I'd say Unreal7 was just trying to put back the redirect after Boud co-opted it for a disambiguation page. And in Unreal7's defense, Boud's edit didn't put much of an edit summary explaining anything and put the England one first! Most disambigs seem to have "(disambiguation)" in the title; this one does not. Since nothing links to "EHRC", I think Boud is well within WP guidelines to change the page's function to a disambig page now that there are articles of two organizations that use "EHRC" for initials. Since I don't see one or the other as more senior or important than the other (and population totals are irrelevant, Boud), I would list the organizations alphabetically by their article titles. Platonk (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


 * EHRC should be a disambiguation page and not a link to either article. I don't see how the argument of population means that one article should link to this or that. It should be based on what is known more and in my opinion, neither is known that well so disambiguation is the best choice. Ue3lman (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)