Talk:ELKI/Archive 1

Comment
Albeit this is rather new research and development, it is (apart from the given publications) independently mentioned e.g. in: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.176 (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * That reference is the only independent reference found by a Google Scholar search for the article title. Looking at that reference, ELKI is certainly mentioned, but i'm not sure it's enough to consitute significant coverage. Qwfp (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Group relevancy
FWIW, the database systems group is independently evaluated as one of the most cited database research groups: but I would not include this reference in the article, because IMHO it is overly advertising, and doesn't actually refer to the ELKI software, but to the group. However, I see little point in having an article on the research group itself (where ELKI could then be merged). --Chire (talk) 12:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)