Talk:EPrivacy Group

Merge?
I disagree with the idea of merging the Trusted Email Open Standard page with the ePrivacy Group page. While ePrivacy Group no longer exists as a company, TEOS is still being downloaded from the FTC web site. In the spirit of open source, the Trusted Email Open Standard should have its own entry in Wikipedia. The sense of the authors of the standard, of which I was one, was that TEOS was being offered to the community with no strings attached and as something that would have a life of its own.
 * I agree. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * As a part of the original TEOS team, I can tell you that it was always intended to be an open standard for use and discussion by the community, separate and apart from the specific products/services of ePrivacy Group. It would be very strange to merge pages about open standards and open technologies into the page of the company that first put them into the wild. Rayeverett (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)