Talk:ESET/Archives/2014

Still no good?
The info in the page are probably not lies, but ad article is ad article. We need even more independent sources, be they supporting "ESET has/does this and that" kind of talk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.36.37 (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Given all the comments and warnings, it seemed like it was past time to clean out the unencyclopedic text which was purely based on references from the company's web site, so I just did that. There presumably are some more reliable third party articles out there from which to build up additional verifiable, encyclopedic content, and I hope someone with no conflict of interest does so, and/or that folks with COI make some suggestions here for good sources.  ★NealMcB★ (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)