Talk:EU–US Free Trade Agreement

Essay-like tone
The article is written like an essay, rather than an encyclopaedia article. "Those of us trained in economics pay attention to the role of incentives in all areas of life." is a particularly choice quote. 46.7.236.155 (talk) 10:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree. Except for the introduction, the article should be deleted (WP:POV and bad sources).--Olag (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

I also agree. Can we get this page deleted? Below are some examples of irrelevant parts.

" When one looks at the indicators of corruption and respect for rule of law, the United States and Western Europe, despite their problems, score much better than the rest of the world". How is this relevant? In the Competition from BRICS section there is talk again about the rule of law in these countries. How is this relevant? In the Trade as a Tool for Growth section: "Enhancing economic development in Europe and the United States, where civil societies have not given up their efforts to live under equality before the law, is essential" Again not relevant. NrH (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * it reads badly because it was plagerised from . IRWolfie- (talk) 13:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources, specifically this forbes article. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)