Talk:Ealing Southall (UK Parliament constituency)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Ealing Southall (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150108053347/http://london.greenparty.org.uk:80/elections/2015-general-election.html to http://london.greenparty.org.uk/elections/2015-general-election.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Respectable analysis
I am trying to find 1) the right word and 2) best source for the sort of analysis that 'proves' this is a safe seat. There is of course no such thing as absolute proof as the term is a relative term. Please do assist. So far the best word I can think of is a phrase "robust academic". I do not wish to cite a newspaper for obvious reasons as to preferences and headline-grabbing all the time.- Adam37   Talk  12:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Newspapers are legitimate Wikipedia sources. doktorb wordsdeeds 13:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)