Talk:Earl Wood

I have only participated in a couple of pages here on Wikipedia, but it surprises me to see that this page on Earl Wood remains rated as "stub" Should the stub rating be changed at this point? If not, can someone explain what makes it remain as a stub. I have looked at other pages rated stub and this page seems considerably more extensive both with prose as well as considerable documentation. Thanks. LungImaging (talk) 04:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)LungImaging