Talk:Earliest findings for hominid art

Untitled
The speedy deletion says this is about a real person. It is not. This references archeological finds from 500,000 BC. The article is valid. Keithh (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The CSD A7 was (probably incorrect, but I couldn't find the exact tag) to show the article doesn't really have much significance. Are there really that many artistic finds for the century 500,000BC? Please note the articles you link to state:
 * Venus of Tan-Tan ...between 300,000 and 500,000BC
 * Venus of Berekhat Ram ...to at least 230,000 years before the present
 * Your claims of the date are inaccurate.
 * Maybe it would be better of a blanket statement, say 200,000BC (and earlier) in Art and 200,000-100,000BC in Art, that way there you could place alot more information in each article.

»xytram« talk 18:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I like it. I will make the appropriate moves. Thanks. Keithh (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay,(gratia)Drift chambers (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Earliest findings for hominid art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121008025344/https://www.msu.edu/~heslipst/contents/ANP440/sapiens.htm?pagewanted=all to https://www.msu.edu/~heslipst/contents/ANP440/sapiens.htm?pagewanted=all

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)