Talk:Early life and career of Gene Roddenberry/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 10:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Image review
Please comment, BELOW this entire Image review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! Just one issue noted, above. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 11:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Gene Roddenberry crop.jpg
 * File:Gene Roddenberry 1939.JPG
 * File:Cessna AT-17.jpg
 * File:B-17 flying over Pacific Ocean.jpg = not done = how do we know this one was a US government photo? Not seeing that confirmed in the source link.
 * File:LAPD Sergeant-1.jpg =
 * File:LAPD Police Officer-3.jpg =
 * I hadn't thought about that - I've swapped it out with an alternative image which has clearer sourcing. Miyagawa (talk) 19:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. Next, on to Stability assessment. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

✅. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

FWIW, I've tracked that questionable image down to "The Army Air Forces In World War II, Volume Six, Men and Planes", originally prepared by the USAF Historical Division, reprint by the University of Chicago Press with the note that, "With the exception of editing, the work is the product of the United States government." More at. -- ToE 03:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Stability assessment
✅. Next, on to rest of review. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Upon inspection of article edit history, I see it was split off from another article, but going back to beginning of this page = no issues.
 * 2) Article talk page similarly and pleasantly devoid of conflict.

Rest of GA Review
NOTE: Please respond, below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

NOTE: Please respond, below entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I've placed this page as GA on Hold, for a time period of Seven Days... &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've changed the section title as recommended, and added that cite (I split the paragraph and forgot to pipe the citation). Miyagawa (talk) 08:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Pass as GA
Pass as GA. Thanks for being so polite and responsive to my recommendations, above. Good job, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 08:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)