Talk:Early life of Pedro II of Brazil/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

User Lecen had a lot of courage to create an article focusing on a particular aspect of a person – it is not very common, specially for Brazilian personalities. But he was very competent and created a long article, with relevant information, images and references. Almost everything that is worth to be read about Peter II childhood is there.

Apart from some red links, I think this must be a nominated article.

Reviewer: Tonyjeff (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Note left by Pyrotec

 * This appears to be another "drive-by" review as per Talk:Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná/GA1 and, possibly, Talk:Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil/GA1. As with Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil message left on "reviewer's talkpage to find out status of review. Pyrotec (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. I think it has potential at WP:FAC, its your decision but if you do decide to try, put it through WP:PR first. Congratulations on the quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 09:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you Pyrotec for taking the time to review and make some corrections to the article! &bull; Astynax talk 09:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)