Talk:Earnings management/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 03:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Stability review
&mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Article edit history going back over one year looks fine.
 * 2) Talk page edit history going back to talk page inception similarly has no problems.

Image review
&mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Hauptbuch Hochstetter vor 1828.jpg = only image used in article. Image hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Checks out alright there on image page..

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 31, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Writing quality is good for GA standards.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to appropriate sources.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects. Sure there's room for expansion in the future, but not necessary at this point for this particular article for GA.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Article is written in a neutral tone. Matter of fact wording and presentation throughout.
 * 5. Article stability? See my comments on this, above, passes here.
 * 6. Images?: See my comments on this, above, passes here.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)