Talk:Earth structure/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 02:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll review this one within the week. At first glance, it seems like you've done a nice job on it. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Notes
 * Fired bricks and concrete are derived from earth, but structures built from these materials are usually not considered earth structures. - please add a reference
 * Done Aymatth2 (talk) 11:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Citations
 * Lindauer & Blitz 1997, pp. 169ff. - Lindauer & Blitz 1997, p. 169ff.
 * Snell 2004, p. 27-28. - Snell 2004, pp. 27-28.
 * Elleh 1998, p. 47. Harv error: link from #CITEREFElleh1998 doesn't point to any citation. (f you install this, HarvErrors are easy to notice.)
 * Porterfield 2004, p. 39. Harv error: link from #CITEREFPorterfield2004 doesn't point to any citation.
 * Sources
 * Elleh, Nnamdi (1997). African Architecture: Evolution and Transformation. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-021506-1. Harv error: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFElleh1997.
 * Porterfield, Jason (2004-05). The Homestead Act of 1862: A Primary Source History of the Settlement of the American Heartland in the Late 19th Century. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4042-0178-1. Retrieved 2014-04-27. Harv error: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFPorterfield.

& Not much to do on this one but I'll put it on hold for the 7 days in case you're busy with other things. Please ping me when you'd like me to take another look. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

All addressed now I think except the first one which I'll ask Aymatth2 to add. Thanks for the review!♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:40, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: