Talk:Earth systems model of intermediate complexity

Overall, fair enough. Comments:


 * 1) Drop the (EMIC) from the title when moving it to article space.
 * 2) I'd drop "However, the degree to which higher resolution models improve accuracy rather than simply precision is contested" from the lede and bury it in the text somewhere.
 * 3) The hist dev is a bit weird, because it covers GCMs too much. It should split off later.
 * 4) The lede says carbon cycles were previously unincorporated, which is wrong. The main text admits that some GCMs include carbon cycle, which is right.
 * 5) You can't say a model has 2.5 dimensions without saying what that means.
 * 6) It seems odd not to mention stuff like running them over glacial cycles.

William M. Connolley (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)