Talk:Easily recognizable code

Usefulness of this article
This article doesn't appear very useful at all. It only serves to a) provide a definition of ERC, which is better placed in a dictionary or the NANP article, and b) criticize the NANPA for allowing geographical assignments of NPA 775 and 321 but not 777. NPAs 775 and 321 are not easily recognizable codes given the NANPA's definition. What purpose does this information serve but to confuse the reader? Definition of ERC is here: http://www.nanpa.com/area_codes/index.html. -Nulbyte 21:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The contents, apart from the refs, are already in North American Numbering Plan so yes, this should be merged into that. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The section in the NANP article that includes ERC can be reworked to provide a heading for Easily Recognizable Code. I think we should merge.Hbrackett (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)