Talk:East African Rift

Plate boundary?
The article says that the African plate is in the process of splitting into two sub-plates. Can we therefore treat the entire rift as a plate boundary? The world has many examples of continental rifts that came very close to break-up but then became inactive, having re      ached beta factors of 4+ e.g. the Gulf of Suez rift and the Rockall Basin. Mikenorton (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * From what I gather in the various references, it is still regarded as one plate, although in the process of splitting. I don't know if there are any hard and fast rules about what the cutoff parameters are, but I will guess in this instance that until there is a substantial line of separation at the surface between blocks of continental crust with oceanic-type crust interposed, there is still a single plate with protoplates.  Right now, we mostly see all continental crust with extension, fault blocks, grabens, etc.  The southern extent of the East African Rift under the Indian Ocean is also incompletely defined, and may actually only amount to indefinite fractures on the seafloor rather than a distinct ridge or transform.  A work in progress. Tmangray (talk) 21:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That's my understanding also. Therefore, would it be better to reword the lead as something like


 * "The East African Rift is a continental rift zone that appears to be a divergent tectonic plate boundary in the making. The rift represents a narrow zone in which the African Plate is in the process of splitting into two new plates called the Nubian and Somalian subplates or protoplates. It runs from the Afar Triple Junction in the Afar Depression southward through eastern African.  It is believed to run offshore of the coast of Mozambique along the Kerimba and Lacerda rifts or grabens, terminating in the Andrew Bain Fracture Zone complex, where it is believed to have its junction with the Southwest Indian Ridge.


 * The East African Rift and the smaller Baikal Rift Zone in eastern Russia, are the only currently active examples of continental rift zones on Earth that appear likely to evolve into divergent plate boundaries.


 * The East African Rift consists of two main branches called the Eastern Rift Valley and the Western Rift Valley. These result from the actions of numerous normal (dip-slip) faults which are typical of all tectonic rift zones."


 * I've made a few other minor changes in there as well. What do you think? Mikenorton (talk) 08:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Seems reasonable. Tmangray (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I rev. the one paragraph because it's important to emphasize the uniqueness of the circumstances. The rift is already regarded as a divergent plate boundary, even though the plates involved are protoplates.  Perhaps I should insert another qualifier like "developing" divergent plate boundary.  In the case of Baikal, there's apparently already a real-life under"sea" rift under the lake, and some geologists have already declared the Amur Plate as a full-fledged plate. Tmangray (talk) 00:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Tmangray since you seem to be the user that created this article from a redirect I deleted the paragraph you added on April 1, 2008 because it was most likely original research. Continental rifts are not unusual and there is active continental rifts other than the Baikal Rift Zone, West Antarctic Rift and the East African Rift. The Northern Cordilleran Volcanic Province rift extending from northwestern British Columia through Yukon to easternmost Alaska is a still active rift zone with volcanic activity as recently as the 18th century and other rifts found on Earth are still seismically active (e.g. the Saint Lawrence rift system). Therefore the East African Rift is not the only example of actively rifting continental crust on Earth besides the Baikal Rift Zone and the West Antarctic Rift. Black Tusk (talk) 22:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

---

Double article ?
This article should be included in this one : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Rift_Valley —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.98.79.68 (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The Great Rift Valley is an outmoded concept linking a continental rift (the East African Rift), passing through a triple junction into an active spreading center in the Red Sea and then continuing along a continental transform, the Dead Sea Transform. This can and should be a very large article, and will be when I get around to expanding it. In contrast, the Great Rift Valley article doesn't have much room for expansion. Mikenorton (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Future
I've just removed the section on the future of the EARS. We don't yet know if it will break up, or even if it does, which branch the break-up will be along, or if a microcontinent could be formed from the Victoria Plate or other microplates. I'm not aware of any reliable sources proposing this sort of timing, but perhaps I've missed something. The image was I think pure OR and it has a major problem with Madagascar, which is somehow unmoved during the break-up. Mikenorton (talk) 19:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late reply, but it's worth noting that Christopher Scotese strongly believes the East African Rift is a failed rift and will hence not open in the future - you might want to look for sources stating that. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 05:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

New article explains unusual parallel deformation
Please see -. I think this can be used to improve this article, but I'm nowhere near proficient in the topic to fo it myself. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Main east Africa article
I have added a geology section to the main east Africa article so I anyone more knowledgeable than me would be able to add more detail it would be amazing. Legendarycool (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)