Talk:East Bengal Ultras/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: KylieInTheSkylie (talk · contribs) 00:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Lead does not meet expectations, see last GAN. Specifically it should be longer and more referenced.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * If you could find more sources, it would bring this up to a pass. Most sources only talk about the tifos.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * May be out of scope.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Closed, Nom is affected by Cyclone Amphan and therefore is taking a wikibreak. See the above for reasons on why it wasn't passed.
 * 2nd opinion was given by SounderBruce.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Closed, Nom is affected by Cyclone Amphan and therefore is taking a wikibreak. See the above for reasons on why it wasn't passed.
 * 2nd opinion was given by SounderBruce.