Talk:East Bergholt

Description of "Old Hall Community"
Like User:Xmassocialist (I believe), I'm a newbie too but my edit of the description of "Old Hall Community" was an attempt to restore a NPOV. My edit can be supported by reference to printed material issued by Old Hall Community. User:Xmassocialist's description of the motivation of community members might have been inspired by a wish to be droll, perhaps, or to be satirical. It falls short, I believe, of the Wikipedia aim of being objective and evidence-based. Pangapilot 18:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * pompous git


 * (in reply to User:Troothwillout's learned comment - not) Pompous I may be but calling me a git is a gratuitous insult! If you want Wikipedia to be an informative and objective encyclopedia, this is hardly the way.  If you want to scribble graffiti on the playground wall, there you go! Pangapilot 20:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Merge with Flatford?

 * Oppose - think there is sufficient material for two separate articles. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose. I agree with Martinevans. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose definitely enough material for separate articles Burley22 (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)