Talk:East Pomeranian offensive

renaming
This is yet another renaming in waiting. It was the East Pomeranian Strategic Offensive Operation since the Wehrmacht didn't have one. Again, the word Strategic is there for a reason.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠ ♥ ♦ ♣ 23:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As with all the others Mrg, there is no need to inflict that ponderous Soviet official name in full in English title of the article, which has a snappier general-use title for it. I've just added the Sov full title in the infobox and in the heading, along with the subordinate operations. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As with all the other Buckshot06, our opinions diverge as I believe the name of the historical event should be as accurate as the name given to it by its participants, and not in the "journalistic" fashion--mrg3105 (comms) ♠ ♥ ♦ ♣ 00:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Not journalistic; English naming conventions... Buckshot06 (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Which one is more common in English literature? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 04:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)