Talk:Eastern Avenue station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be taking this one. ev iolite  (talk)  18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments:
 * Where is "Urban Ring Phase 2 FACT SHEET" from, and why is it an RS? I understand it is used only to cite a general description of the project, so not a big deal.
 * ✅ It's from a Massachusetts state agency - I've added that to the citation.
 * Could the connection to the MBTA bus and the adjoining stations (as shown in the infobox) be also mentioned and referenced in the station layout section?
 * I mentioned and cited the local bus. The adjacent stations are generally treated as a navigation aid; unless there's a particular relation with one of the stations (such as being extremely close, or one a replacement for the other, etc), they don't need to be discussed in the prose.
 * Link Everett, Massachusetts
 * Link Right-of-way (transportation) to avoid confusion with the common legal definition
 * Consider linking South Boston
 * Link Bellingham Square (or maybe Bellingham Square station? unsure)
 * Consider linking South Boston
 * Link Bellingham Square (or maybe Bellingham Square station? unsure)
 * Link Bellingham Square (or maybe Bellingham Square station? unsure)

It was a nice read overall, well written, with few issues (mostly minor nitpicks with links) - putting on hold for now. Thanks, ev iolite   (talk)  23:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I believe I've addressed all your comments. (BTW, if you're interested in more GA reviews, I've nominated three other articles that share a lot of history with this one: Box District station, Bellingham Square station, and Chelsea station (MBTA). I've already made the same copyedits to those three. No pressure, of course!) Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Happy to promote this to GA given those edits. (And I'll see if I can look at those other noms later, but right now I'm trying to review one nomination from each GA topic.) Great work. ev iolite   (talk)  03:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)