Talk:Eazy-E/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Lead
 * Everything in the lead meets the criteria, IMO, so I will pass it
 * Early Life
 * Delink words that are already in the lead, such as "Compton, California", "Los Angeles", and "Ruthless Records".
 * Fixed Crowz  RSA  21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * "In 1986, at the age of 23, Wright had allegedly earned as much as $250,000 from dealing drugs." - that money value is the first mention of US Currency, right? Link United State dollar on either "$" or add pipelink it as USD in parenthesis, e.g. $250,000 (USD).
 * Fixed Crowz  RSA  21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Musical Career
 * Some words are over linked again: "Ruthless Records", " Dr. Dre", and "Ice Cube"
 * Fixed Crowz  RSA  21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Legal issues
 * Pass
 * Death
 * Pass
 * Musical influences and style
 * Over linking again on the first line alone, delink: "Ice-T", "Redd Foxx", "King Tee", "Bootsy Collins", "Run-D.M.C.", "Richard Pryor", "The Egyptian Lover", "Schoolly D", "Too $hort", "Prince", "The Sugarhill Gang", and "George Clinton". Further into the section: "Eazy-Duz-It", "Ice Cube, The D.O.C., and "MC Ren" (twice in the third paragraph), "The D.O.C.", "MC Ren". In the legacy section: "Billboard 200", "Eazy-Duz-It", and "Real Muthaphuckkin G's".
 * Fixed Crowz  RSA  21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Discography
 * Pass
 * References
 * Don't write the title in all capital, like correct #53 "ABOUT THE OFFICIAL HIP HOP HALL OF FAME AND PRODUCER JT THOMPSON"
 * Fixed Crowz  RSA  21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Some of the references don't have accessdates, I am not talking about the references to books and magazines, I mean the refs that are online. Example, there are no accessdates for the following references:
 * Ref #3
 * Ref #5
 * Ref #6; also why does the published date read "2006-03-2006", rather than "2006-03-26"?
 * Refs #9 - #11
 * Ref # 16
 * Ref # 27
 * Ref # 29
 * Ref # 35
 * Ref # 38
 * Ref # 53
 * Template:Cite web says that retrieval date "should be given if the publication date is unknown", so I only fixed #11. Crowz  RSA  21:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Conclusion

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: