Talk:Echelon (2001 video game)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Echelon (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100407122253/http://www.gamespot.com:80/gamespot/features/pc/bestof_2001_rc/p9_01.html to http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/pc/bestof_2001_rc/p9_01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Add 'controversy' section?
Would it be beneficial to add a section on the controversy surrounding this game's US release? according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethesda_Softworks#Controversies , "Bethesda Softworks published Echelon in the United States, a video game developed by Russian developers Madia. The developers stated that Bethesda didn't pay a single cent from boxed sales of the game, as was specified in the contract according to Madia. The developers wrote an open letter to Bethesda in which they have detailed the whole affair but Bethesda still refused to pay. In the end Madia decided not to take it to court. Pete Hines VP of PR at Bethesda later stated that Madia presented misleading allegations about Bethesda's role as publisher of Echelon in North America and that Bethesda has no contractual obligations to Madia", seems like it would improve on the current stub status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temporalarcheologist (talk • contribs) 03:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I think it is warranted here. At least to mention it to some degree.Timur9008 (talk) 11:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)