Talk:Echinognathus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 13:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * This is a very well-written article that only needs minor adjustments to be GA.
 * Thank you :) Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * "endognathary" – I feel that this could be in violation of WP:TECHNICAL in the lead. I suggest either replacing the word with something less technical or giving greater prominence to the definition, maybe with an explanation of how it is used to handle the food (as long as this can be substantiated from a verified source).
 * I've added that it means it was used to handle food. Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * "appendage" – is repeated with proximity in the second paragraph. Is there a synonym that could be used?
 * I've replaced two instances of "appendage" with "limb". Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The lead seems very short. I suggest that it could be expanded based on the verified data in the main body.
 * I've expanded the lead a bit. Ichthyovenator (talk) 09:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. I will complete the assessment. simongraham (talk) 15:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Assessment
 Comprehension: The comprehension is good.

Verifiability: The article is verifiable.

Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.

Neutrality: The article is neutral.

Stability: The article is stable. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.

Overall: Pass/fail. 

