Talk:Echium plantagineum in Australia

Salvation Jane the song
Information about the Feldon song Salvation Jane doesn't belong in this article. Can we look at creating a Salvation Jane (disambiguation) page? Donama (talk) 00:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved Mike Cline (talk) 17:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Echium plantagineum in Australia → Paterson's Curse in Australia – Patterson's Curse is the common name in Australia and an article of this nature should use the common name rather than the scientific name. The common name of Patterson's Curse, which is the common name in Australia, would be more widely recognisable than Echium plantagineum. See previous discussion at Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 36. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you sure of the spelling? Reliable sources seem to prefer the single "t". --AussieLegend (talk) 09:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I went on what is in the current article. The spelling is not consistent within the article and the first occurrence is double "t". I will fix it. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The scientific name gets more ghits in Books and Scholar. I'm more inclined to believe that the scientific name is the most commonly used name in reliable sources to refer to this species, thus I see no reason why this article about it in Australia would need to be titled any differently. Rkitko (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose According to the Government of South Australia Animal and Plant Control Commission, the common name is "Salvation Jane." With so many commonly used common names (and spellings), and one unambiguous scientific name, we stick with the scientific name. Also, the daughter article of the main plant article should use the same name: Echium plantagineum > Echium plantagineum in Australia. Finally, a quick Google Scholar search shows that the most reliable sources predominantly use the scientific name (though it also seems that the single "t," "Paterson's", is more common than the double "t"). First Light (talk) 14:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment But we should at least have a redirect? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That's what redirects are for... I see no problem with that. The issue would be inappropriate renaming. Rkitko (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Echium plantagineum in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101117170853/http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/htm/bc/ttox05.htm to http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/htm/bc/ttox05.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)