Talk:Eckenlied

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the site linked to is clearly a copy of the Wikipedia article, which has existed for years here at Legends about Theoderic the Great. In fact, the entire article linked to is a copy of that Wikipedia article. As I am the author of both this original article and this new one, there is absolutely no way that this violates copyright.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm unsure what the proper procedure is here: User:KN2731, is there any way that, given these facts, you can rescind your nomination?Ermenrich (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The page listed uses the World Heritage Encyclopedia, which is a known Wikipedia mirror: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/Vwxyz#World_Heritage_Encyclopedia. Therefore the request should be denied.Ermenrich (talk) 15:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, I didn't realise it was a mirror. I saw the material was almost exactly identical and immediately jumped to the conclusion that it violated G12. My apologies again for the inconvenience. I've removed the speedy deletion tag. ~ KN2731 {t ⋅ c} 15:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the article is a new creation in order to move detailed material from Legends about Theoderic the Great. The Project Gutenberg copy gives its source aa the World Heritage Encyclopedia, and this in turn credits the source as the WP article "Legends about Theoderic the Great" - see

This is WP being repeatedly mirrored, it is NOT a copyright violation.