Talk:EcoDisc

Hold on
In my opinion only facts - which are also referenced and based through sources - are stated. Thus, this page is not commerce or advertising. Note that I also stated the negative aspects of the product.
 * Sorry no, you have referenced your companys webpage, there are no other sources to verify what you are claiming. mark nutley (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What's your actual problem? If you take a look at VCDHD e.g. then you won't see any more sources. Do you want me to proof that the Disc consists of only one layer and uses less CO2? --Lovecrft (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is you are making claims about a product with no third party reliable sources to back you claims. Please read wp:rs and wp:v to get an idea of what is needed in an article mark nutley (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I inserted numerous new sources..if you'd be so kind as to look it over. (: --Lovecrft (talk) 15:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That might be enough to save the article, don`t remove the speedy tag though until an admin has had a chance to look, if it passes muster he/she will remove the tag, good luck mark nutley (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

I reviewed the article and have removed the G11 speedy deletion nomination and hangon tags. The article is not unambiguously promotional. I have some substantial doubt that this article would survive an AFD nomination — not so much because of spamishness but because of lack of notability — but I don't think that it qualifies for speedy deletion. —  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 16:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Longevity
What is the longevity of Ecodisc compared to standard DVD? Are they subject to the same oxidization issues as disc-based media? 68.146.81.123 (talk) 23:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)