Talk:Ecological speciation/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 14:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for creating this article and for what you've added to it so far. It looks to be off to a good start, but I think this GA nomination may be premature, given the article only has six sentences of content at this time; since there's at least one full-length discussion of the subject per Google Books, and many more discussions and examples of it, I don't think this article can be said to cover the main aspects of the topic yet. (This is criterion 3a of the GA crtieria).

That's no disrespect to your work so far, though. I hope you'll consider resubmitting this when it's more fleshed out, though--feel free to do so at any time (including right now if you disagree with my assessment). Cheers and all best, Khazar2 (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Daniel

Thank you Khazar2 for your kind review. It's my first article and I got excited. Will keep working on this. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elintripido (talk • contribs) 16:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Good luck! You might start off by nominating it at WP:DYK once it's long enough. That way you can get more feedback before going for GA again. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)