Talk:Economic reforms in India

The scope of this article is too broad and if one uses it's definition of economic reforms, then one would have to begin covering economic reforms from the indus valley period onwards, whose beginnings as well as its end, no doubt will fit into the differences from the economic practices of the previous eras theory. The Economic_history of India article aims to cover all these periods. What we can do is, just focus the article on a certain period, say post 1991, which most people will associate the word "reforms" with and rewrite it. pamri July 8, 2005 03:48 (UTC)

Merge from Left-nationalist economic history of India
Rather than try to merge in the information myself from the page The Great Calamity I have moved the page to Talk:Economic reforms in India/Left-nationalist economic history of India so that anything which can be salvaged can be added into this article. See Articles for deletion/The Great Calamity for the reasoning behind this move.--Philip Baird Shearer 19:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Bias
This article, in particualr the part dealing with British rule, seems biased in the extreme. There are a number of sweeping statements made without proper sources (genocide for example), all the author cited seem to Indian nationalists and Marxists aside from Sen, who doesn't seem to give any credence to any of these views). There is a total ignorance of work of modern schoars such as Tirthankar Roy, BR Tomlinson, D.K. Fieldhouse etc who have added so much to this debate. When I get the time I shall substantially edit this. article is nobody has any objectionsLed125 14:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

References are kinda unreliable..
the article suffers from lack of inline citation and WP:NPOV Mugunth ( ping me!!!, contribs ) 17:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)