Talk:Economic value added/Archives/2012

Relationship to market value added
I think there are sources needed for this chapter. if you look at Titman and Martin (2007) Valuation – The Art and Science of Corporate Investment Decisions, Pearson. (page 388), they clearly disagree with MVA being the PV of all future EVAs. Also Uyemura, D. G., Kantor, C. C. and Pettit, J. M., Stern Stuart & Co (1996) EVA for Banks Value Creation, Risk Management, and Profitability Management could only identify a statistical correlation rather than a strictly algebraic relationship between the two. --85.127.207.123 (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

other
I would like to know how is Net present Value (NPV) of Net Cash Flows of a project always equal to the NPV of a Economic Value added (EVA) ?

Where Cash Flows = NOPAT + Depreciation - Capital Exps - Investment in Working Capital

EVA = NOPAT - Cost of Capital

Please throw some light on the same. cbvcbcbc Thanks Ratna Gandhi

Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

-- TSR

Under Other measures of shareholder value I added Total Shareholder Return. This seemed like an ommissions, and its the most direct measure of shareholder value. Its Capital Gains (or losses) + Dividends   over a given period, expressed as a percentage so it can be compared across companies or time periods. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.58.165 (talk) 12:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Illustration
This article needs a illustration badly. Anwar (talk) 12:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus(talk) 16:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Economic value added → Economic Value Added –

Oops, it's a proprietary name. Can't seem to self-revert my move that downcased it. Tony  (talk)  00:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I was about to say that if this is a self-revert, then it should be done uncontroversially and speedily. But looking through the logs, I can't see that this article has ever been moved. Sure you're not confusing it with another article? Or am I missing something really obvious? Jenks24 (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. This is a registered trademark and is capitalised, and we should do the same here. I agree with Jenks24 that this page seems to have never been moved though. It looks like the reason the nominator couldn't move this page to the capitalised version was because Economic Value Added has a non-trivial edit history. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 05:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.