Talk:Ecosystem management

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 17 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KNGeist.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Siperez. Peer reviewers: Isagreen, Liv Davis, Hnworth, HRVEF.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Isagreen — Edit Suggestions
•	First Note: Potentially an excessive use of quotations in the formulation section, as the first bit has multiple quotes in a row. •	Second Note: I noticed that you removed the Keystone Pipeline example for issues of relevance to ecosystem management. I do wonder if removing the example was the right call, or if a significant rework to make it fit would be better. I only suggest this because it is a very popular, recent, and potentially relevant case that might communicate well to a larger audience. •	Third Note: While the overall tone of the article now seems less argumentative, it still feels a bit academic in tone. I think it could use some edits for a more applied approach in writing style so that the information is communicated a bit more like an encyclopedia and less like a conference paper. This is not the case for every sentence/section, but it happens several times throughout. •	I have very few suggestions as this article is in great shape. I think there could still be some minor changes here and there, but nothing to serious. I really look forward to seeing the final product, and hope to see more in the future on the economic aspects of this work! Isagreen (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Minor addition
I added an example of stakeholders underneath that heading, as well as adding a few sources in regards to stakeholders. Another note: I would maybe reduce the use of quotations, as I am not sure that Wikipedia articles are meant to have lots of direct quotations. This article is fantastic though, and I can't think of much else to edit! Great work! Mggale (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC) (talk)

Source removal
I undid this edit by who called it "citespam". I'm not sure why - it's a highly-cited source, certainly more so than a lot of the other sources in the article. It seems entirely appropriate. Guettarda (talk) 20:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm more puzzled, seeing similar edits across my watchlist: restoration ecology, sustainability. What's going on here? Guettarda (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * As far as I can tell, every citation we have to Robert Lackey was added by one of three accounts:, , or . All three of these accounts are unusually focused on adding the works on Professor Lackey, often adding the cites without adding content - and in a few cases, adding a Lackey cite to direct quotes written by someone else. This seems like a case of WP:CITESPAM to me. If any of these cites are useful afterall, please feel free to restore. - MrOllie (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * rather than forcing me to dig through all your edits, could you just revert the additions? This is a solid source you're removing. Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 03:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

This was my first time reading the Ecosystem Management article. I was very impressed at the scope and range of ideas that the author(s) provide here. It includes a history of the topic, stakeholders, and approaches. The wording moves fluently and the structure is supportive of the ideas expressed in the writing. I like that each section is formatted in a way that offers a lot of information, but is not overwhelming. It is a unique way to get the ideas across. There are also a lot of pictures that are clear, relevant, and aesthetically pleasing. I felt very informed after reading this article and was surprised to see the amount of content that the article provides. Overall, this article has a great design, relevant information, and seems to offer significant material to the reader. Ravanvoo (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Marion - Very minor additions
This article is excellent and has seen a lot of improvement since the time I saw it before. I have added a couple of sources and linked some terms to other wiki articles as to give readers a clearer insight into some topics. I also re-formatted some sources to make them more similar to one another. Great work! Mggale (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2021

== Rachel V final review = The ecosystem management article is one that continues to impress me. I love the imagery and the scope of the article. It is very inclusive and clearly written with intent. I added a few links to the article, but did not see very many grammatical or contextual flaws. Sierra has done a fantastic job cleaning up this piece and bringing it up to what I believe resembles a Featured Article! Ravanvoo (talk) 01:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hanna W final review
I think this is an extremely strong article that meets all the criteria for a Good Article! It is highly informative and well-written, well-structured and easily readable, uses images throughout, and is very well cited. I also think that other comments on the talk page were clearly taken into account during the editing process, since the number of quotations is now at a level in line with other Wikipedia articles. I added a few links to other articles, but other than that made no edits. Great job! Weilh (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Field Ecology and Conservation Technology
— Assignment last updated by Spillers03 (talk) 14:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Biology
Ways a man can manage ecosystems 105.113.57.41 (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Economic and management science.      TERM 2.       topic.  Accounting concepts
'Questions ' Yendiswa (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Definition Yendiswa (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)