Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'm putting this on hold for now. The article, in my opinion, is a mess, but I don't think it's quite beyond repair. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 18:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * "Premise" section is totally unsourced.
 * "one of the last, if not the last, of the original Cartoon Cartoons still on the air." Is this acceptable phrasing?
 * "It is currently the longest-running original cartoon on Cartoon Network." I've been told not to use "currently". Perhaps "as of 2008"?
 * Overview is mostly unsourced as well.
 * Original research in many places ("similar to Squigglevision", everything pertaining to pop culture references, AKA appearances), etc.
 * Characters: Can this be summarized in prose instead of a list?
 * Awards and nominations are unsourced.
 * Surely there's more critical reaction than this.
 * "Other Works" section is unsourced.
 * Most references are not formatted with cite web. There are other problems with the formatting of references as well.
 * Is reference 1 (which is also references 2 and 4) reliable? What about reference 11?
 * Overall, I think there should be much more to say than this. The article seems too short for GA class.
 * Despite Shnitzel's Treelo's efforts to pretty up this article over the past week, I have to fail it for now. There are significant portions that are still unsourced, and some issues with original research and tone. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)