Talk:Ed Blake/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see What is a good article?)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Few copyedits made
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Uses Baseball-Reference.com, The Sporting News, a local newspaper, retrosheet.org, and baseballinwartime.co.uk
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * 2) It is stable.
 * 3) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * No images used.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No images used.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Thanks :) Guess I'm getting better at writing if it was able to be passed without a hold. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 19:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)