Talk:Ed Kosiski

4/25/2012 Removed large block of un-sourced, irrelevant critique of the judicial system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.70.63.4 (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

5/14/2012 Re-removed large block of un-sourced, irrelevant critique of the judicial system. Honestly, this page should just be locked. It seems to be attracting a "she deserved raping" character.

5/16/2012 I hope this page is locked so the large block remains as it should. It isn't un-sourced and it isn't irrelevant. As far as the "she deserved raping" comment, the prosecutor should have refused to reduce charges so the actual facts could come out. I don't know anyone personally in this story in this story, but I know how the justice system works and the strategies involved fall well-short of a pointed interest in actual truth being determined in a large number of instances. To make a hypothetical point, being a victim of "attempted sexual assault" means there was no one actually assaulted. Avoiding trial so the prosecution witness doesn't have to testify is always a shady strategy, especially in cases where the consequences are so high, not only in the present, but in the future if a true child-predator is given a light sentence as a result or an innocent person is manipulated by games and is left throwing in the towel to bring closure to their situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.136.147 (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

5/28/2012 It's totally irrelevant. This is a biographical page. The facts are as I stated them - your frequent additions are matters of opinion. A critique of the judicial system or an attack on the character of the victim, add nothing to this page (and the latter is creepy). Ed chose to avoid trial (http://omaha.com/article/20110907/NEWS97/709079922), the judicial system did not. Plea-bargains are not inflicted on a defendant. Had he gone to trial he could have presented all of the evidence he wanted. I'm also not totally sure what you consider a "true child-predator" to be, but read the references - by any measure Ed fits the bill. (Surely, you are not suggesting that Ed is not a "true child-predator" because he paid someone for the "right" to do this?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.70.63.4 (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

6/21/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

6/24/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

6/25/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

6/26/2012 Re-removed block of commentary about the judicial system, an opinion on it's handling of this case, some opinions on the character of the victim, etc. --174.70.63.4 (talk) 06:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

8/1/2012 Reported for resumption of edit war. 174.70.63.4 (talk) 06:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

8/1/2012 ​ The result of reporting this vandalism was that this page was semi-protected without reverting. Please revert this article to: Diff:   All sources are cited and the additional information is relevant for a BLP article. Thank you.
 * Yes check.svg Done Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 04:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)