Talk:Edgar J. Anzola

Disagreement Over the Individual's Portrait
in question has caused a ruckus which now includes libel in the article edit comments.

Here we have the guidelines for when a work enters public domain. Given the nationality of the individual, it would be reasonable to assume that the content in question may not have been produced or published in the United States so with whom does the burden of proof lie?

Given the subject's period of activity, and, if it were to fall under United States copyright law, the image may not enter public domain until 2021 or 2047 which still depends on knowing when it was produced.

If the argument cannot be settled without further libelous comments, perhaps the sketch from here may provide a living contact for said copyright information or from what original reference was used for the sketch.

Lastly, the guidelines over fair-use of non-free content infer that the use of the image is acceptable so long as it isn't hosted on wikimedia where fair-use content is not permitted and, provided that the depiction is veritably the subject of the article, this copyright examination request should not have been needed.

-- Steven Kirkland ( talk ) 22:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)