Talk:Edict of Torda/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

I'll review this over the next several days. --14:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Images
 * All are properly licensed and appropriate for the article


 * Lede
 * Good summary, no changes needed.


 * Background
 * I would link burghers


 * Toward tolerance
 * No changes needed, but I would make the word "jizya" appear in the text, not just the link, if I were you. It's nothing to stand in the way of the GA nomination, just my opinion.


 * John Sigismund, Dávid and Biandrata
 * "denominational flexibility": this is a quote, but it's not clear who said it. A historian? If so, name that person.


 * The Edict
 * This section is fine, no changes needed

Everything else looks good to me. After these minor issues are addressed, I'll be happy to promote this article. --Coemgenus (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you four your review. I modified the article in accordance with your above suggestion. Please let me know if any further action is needed. Borsoka (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks great, I'll promote it right away. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you again for the review. I highly appreciate your hard work. Borsoka (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)