Talk:Edinburgh Festival Fringe/Archive 2006

Archive 2006 | Archive 2007 &rarr;

Guy Masterson
A user deleted a selection I wrote about Guy Masterson's recent high profile productions at the Assembley Rooms. I've now provided several external links at appropriate points establishing the notability of these plays: they all attracted a relatively huge amount of press coverage. I have, however, restructured the opening sentence to locate the emphasis upon the plays rather than upon Masterson. I hope this addresses th point User:DJ Clayworth made in his edit summary. The JPS 15:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)


 * It doesn't address the point for me. I I've just looked at the page for the first time, and was a bit surprised to see a section on 'High profile shows', but assumed this was going to be about controversial shows such as Corpus Christi or Jerry Springer the Opera. Though I acknowledge Guy Masterson's prominence, I cannot see why a couple of particular shows he directed at one venue should be singled out among the thousands. I am very much tempted to delete this section. ColinFine 14:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd much rather you add to the section by including shows that you think are notable rather than delete them. The JPS talk to me  15:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes but ...
 * Two (or three or four) POV's don't make NPOV
 * If the section gets any kind of balance it'll be enormous.
 * I really don't see the value of the section. What makes a show notable? Aren't all the shows that win Fringe Firsts ipso facto notable? Is a show that gets no audience notable? etc. etc.


 * ColinFine 19:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I have attempted a slight watering down of the section but I generally agree that the Guy Masterson-related material is out of proportion ... BAK 12:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Venues
It seems to me that the Venues section has got out of hand. As a former director of a couple of venues not listed, I'm tempted just to add them, but then why not every other venue? I'm not sure what to do with this, but on the whole I think the section should go, or else be a separate article which has room to accommodate every venue anybody wants to add. ColinFine 14:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps if we only included venues notable enough for their own article. The other section that we need to keep an eye on is the list of performers: this started a short list of things like Beyond the Fringe, but is like a light to a moth for any group wanting publicity. The JPS talk to me  15:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, that will help for a bit. Of course there's nothing to stop other venues creating articles ... ColinFine 19:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that the section should go, except for the provision of a link where they can find venues, eg Fringe web site ... BAK 12:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Further thought - here are some drafty words for this section that I would need to edit ... "No history of the Fringe would be complete without a brief mention of the venues; there were 261 in 2006. In essence, use is made of every conceivable space from proper theatres (Traverse), custom-made theatres (Music Hall in the Assembly Rooms), to lecture theatres (Pleasance and George Square), other university rooms and spaces, (disused) church halls, schools, a public toilet, the back of a taxi, or even in your own home / place of rest. In the 1950s and 1960s there was typically one hall per group. Sharing then became popular as a means of cutting costs with a single performing space being used for up to 6 or 7 different shows per day. Super-venues with many performing spaces, such as Assembly rooms, Pleasance and Gilded Balloon, took this idea further in the early 1980s. The Circuit, another super-venue, came to set up a tented “village” (including one space with room for 400 punters) at the previously mentioned “Hole in The Ground”, where the Saltire complex, which now houses the Traverse, was subsequently built" ... I would remove the current venue list and point to the Fringe web site and/or I have a list of 30+ venues with web site addresses (Fringe web site does not provide web site addresses for some reason) that I could expand to the full number and point people to them. I do not consider that Wikipedia is the place for a full list of venues even if there was a separate article. What do you think? If I have not heard any voices to the contrary by 16th September 2006 then I will go ahead and implement the words (albeit slightly modified) and point to the Fringe web site (in the short term) ... BAK 10:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be more appropriate. When you have done it I shall probably add a paragraph about the groups who run the venues - not particular venues, but just about how and why some of the venues work. ColinFine 19:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't see the point of the '(disused)' in front of 'church halls'. Some may be disused, but others are not. On that point, churches are also used as venues - there are quite a few, some letting their space and others actually organising acts. I have edited the article accordingly.Ewan carmichael 11:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Fringe Legacy
I think that the list of performers at the end of the section should be dispensed with, as indicated by The JPS and anybody of particular note can be added in the body of the text ... BAK 12:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC).


 * I am minded to alter the final sentence and list to the following: "More recent comedy performers to have been 'discovered' include: Reduced Shakespeare Company, Steve Coogan, Jenny Eclair, The League of Gentlemen, Al Murray and Rich Hall." This means that Janey Godley, Dave Gorman, Gary Le Strange, The Sitcom Trials and Count Arthur Strong will be deleted. I will implement this change on 16th September unless anybody has any strong views. BAK 17:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Criticism
I have revamped this section. Summary of changes can be found in User_Talk:BAK.

BAK 12:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)