Talk:Edward Emmett Dougherty

Share your concern about this source
Hi, Zigig20s I agree that the Georgian Revival article is a blog with commercial interests, and therefore probably not usable as a RS, however well written. I have deleted the info about Blanche Carson. In its present state, the article draws multiple times on this website as a citation. Shouldn't all be deleted? We can't use the RS rule selectively can we? Could you put the second opinion you received below this? I read it, now I can't find it again.

Also, Guilford Dudley is not "Guildfor" Dudley. I had already corrected the error. Any reason why you changed it back? Both Jr and Sr Dudley spelled it the same. Best--Eagledj (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, there was a typo on the NRHP list with the Guildford Dudley, Sr. and Anne Dallas House. I have fixed it. As for the problematic RS, it comes from this version. I left a note there, and User:KJP1 replied...I think it should be used only sparingly, or (ideally) not at all.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)